When deciding which university to attend, many students consider ranking alongside personal experiences and recommendations from friends. However, rankings have a number of disadvantages and shouldn’t be the sole reason to choose a school.
With universities increasingly becoming global and interconnected, the need for a tool to map and compare higher education institutions emerged. Since then, various ranking organizations have developed and published university rankings. While some focus on world rankings, others are regional or country-based. Some focus on research output while others prioritize teaching quality or other factors.
The most popular and influential are THE, QS, ARWU, and CWUR. However, each ranking has its own methodology and criteria that influence the final outcome. Some of the more prominent university ranking systems have been subject to criticism for relying on biased metrics. These include citation counts, journal impact factor, and student acceptance rates, among others.
Despite these flaws, the popularity of university ranking continues to grow. The value of ranking data is undeniable, as it provides a useful benchmark for universities to identify and work on their strengths. In addition, some universities may receive funding or partnership opportunities based on their ranking position.
As a result, universities prioritize efforts to improve their ranking, which can result in a decrease in teaching quality and an increase in bureaucracy, financial burdens, and competition. To help counteract these negative effects, it is crucial that universities understand the methodologies behind the ranking systems and develop their own internal evaluation system based on non-competitive, holistic, and objective indicators.
About the Author
